.

Community Dental Health

Cover Date
September 2009
Print ISSN
0265 539X
Electronic ISSN
Vol
26
Issue
3

Articles from this issue

TitlePage StartPage EndD.O.I.
Editorial - The contributions of Edward H. Angle to dental public health 130 131 10.1922/CDH_2570Peck02
The fractional urinary fluoride excretion of adults consuming naturally and artificially fluoridated water and the influence of water hardness: A randomized trial. 132 137 10.1922/CDH_2339Villa06
The prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in the high and low altitude parts of Central Plateau, Nigeria 138 142 10.1922/CDH_2287Akosu05
Prevalence of enamel defects related to pre-, peri- and postnatal factors in a Brazilian population. 143 149 10.1922/CDH_2268Massoni07
Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans 150 156 10.1922/CDH_2316Usgodaarachchi07
Consent of older children participating in BASCD coordinated dental epidemiology surveys in Wales. 157 161 10.1922/CDH_2296Monaghan05
Predicting relative need for urgent dental care 162 169 10.1922/CDH_2254Spencer08
A comparison of Personal Dental Service (PDS) and General Dental Service (GDS) patients in terms of reported interventions, oral health and dentists’ perceptions 170 176 10.1922/CDH_2259Hill07
Hopelessness, depression and oral health concerns reported by community dwelling older Australians 177 182 10.1922/CDH_2310Quine06
Higher-order exploratory factor analysis of the Dental Subscale of Children’s Fear Survey Schedule in a Taiwanese population. 183 187 10.1922/CDH_2322Chang05
Opportunities and challenges to promoting oral health in primary schools 188 192 10.1922/CDH_2289Gill05


Predicting relative need for urgent dental care


Article Price £10.00
Page Start
162
Page End
169
D.O.I.
10.1922/CDH_2254Spencer08
Authors
  • L Luzzi
  • A.J. Spencer
  • K.F. Roberts-Thomson
  • K Jones

Abstract

Objective: To develop prediction models of the relative need for care to differentiate between urgent and not urgent individuals presenting for emergency dental care. Design and Methods: Data were collected from 839 adults presenting to public dental clinics across South Australia (SA) and New South Wales (NSW) for emergency dental care. Prediction of the urgency of emergency dental care was based on the assessment of two binary logistic regression models - Model 1: urgency of care=<48 hours vs. 2+ days, Model 2: urgency of care=2–7 days vs. 8+ days. Subsequently predictive equations for urgency of emergency dental care were developed using binary logistic regression analysis. The models incorporated subjective oral health indicators (i.e., experience of pain or other oral symptoms) and measures of psychosocial impact of oral disorders (i.e., difficulty sleeping and being worried about the appearance/health of one’s teeth or mouth). Results: The cut-off point for the prediction of urgency was defined as a probability value ≥0.40 and ≥0.50 for Model 1 and Model 2 respectively. These cut-off values were chosen as they produced test results that were consistent with the proportions of patients falling into various urgency categories derived from dentist’s assessment of urgency. Model 1’s sensitivity was 58%, specificity 77% and positive predictive value (PPV) 59%. Model 2’s sensitivity was 75%, specificity 65% and PPV 71%. Conclusions: These models of relative need may be useful tools for the screening of urgent dental care and for allocating priority among patients presenting for emergency dental care.

Key words: Emergency dental care, prediction, urgency


Editorial correspondence and enquires:

Professor D O'Mullane
c/o Ms Colette Spicer
The Editorial Assistant
Oral Health Research Services Centre
University Dental School & Hospital
Wilton, Cork
Ireland.
e-mail: cdh@ucc.ie

Publisher correspondence and enquires:

FDI World Dental Press Ltd
5 Battery Green Road
Lowestoft , Suffolk
NR32 IDE
UK
Tel: +44 1502 511522
Fax: +44 1502 583152
e-mail: office@fdipress.org

Technical Support:

e-mail: cdhsupport@fdipress.org