December 2007

Volume 24, Issue 4

Editorial - The STROBE initiative and its implications for dental public health research

Authors: M. Downer


In recent years, an armoury of guidelines and checklists has been produced to assist researchers in the conduct and reporting of biomedical studies. The information contained in these publications has been of considerable benefit to the scientific community and interested clinicians, and has greatly enhanced the drive towards evidence-based clinical practice. The material is the outcome of deliberations by groups of leading authorities, closely involved in the various types of experimental, descriptive and review studies covered, and in their reporting and publication. It represents a repository of expertise that only existed fragmentarily hitherto. The intention of the producers of the various documents, and the leading biomedical journals to which many of them are affiliated, is to ensure that published material is the soundest and most reliable available, and to refine and codify the reporting of the advances taking place continually in the biomedical field. The principles put forward, aimed at setting standards and determining courses of action in the conduct and reporting of research, are making a major contribution to systematising investigations into the distribution of diseases and disorders in human populations and their determinants. Important among the collection of manuals, working documents and guidelines hitherto published are those concerned with the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCT), exemplified by the CONSORT statement (Altman, 1996); those dealing with the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses, notably the QUORUM statement – Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (Clarke, 2000); those covering systematic reviews of RCTs, specifically the guidelines and training manuals (including the QUORUM statement) promulgated by the Cochrane Collaboration,, (named after the celebrated medical epidemiologist who inspired its creation); and those advising on the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews of both RCTs and observational studies (NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001). The authors of these documents have an ongoing interest in revisiting and updating them. They come together regularly to review feed back from interested outside parties and to reconsider and modify their published guidance. A revised version of the CONSORT statement for the reporting of parallel-group randomised trials, for example, appeared in 2000 and it is understood a further version is in development.


Other articles in this issue

Article Pages Access
Editorial - The STROBE initiative and its implications for dental public health research 194-197 Download
Evaluation of the Parental Perceptions Questionnaire, a component of the COHQoL, for use in the UK. 198-204 Download
Dental care use: does dental insurance truly make a difference in the US? 205-212 Download
Private dental health expenditure in Greece by region and income: comparison between the years 1987 and 1998. 213-216 Download
The prevalence and severity of dental pain in 14-15 year old Brazilian schoolchildren 217-224 Download
Dental caries prevalence among adults in Denmark – the impact of socio-demographic factors and use of oral health services 225-232 Download
The effect of advance telephone prompting in a survey of general dental practitioners in Scotland: A randomised controlled trial 233-237 Download
Dental caries trends among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian children 238-246 Download
Assessment of the reliability and validity of the Dental Neglect Scale in Norwegian adults 247-252 Download
Determinants of ECC in Sardinian preschool children 253-256 Download
The working practices and career satisfaction of dental therapists in New Zealand 257-263 Download
Short Communication - Caries prevalence and location and dental treatment needs in preschoolers in Athens – GENESIS Project 264-267 Download
BASCD Presidential Address - BASCD SPRING SCIENTIFIC MEETING 268-270 Download


Online (Single user only)
Institution Online (IP address validation)

Back issues may be obtained from the publisher

Consider recommending subscription to your institution's library

You can view Open Access papers without a subscription.